User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rusalkii | 82 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Open | 19:36, 23 April 2025 | 5 days, 16 hours | no | report |
| EggRoll97 | 91 | 45 | 9 | 67 | Open | 15:07, 19 April 2025 | 1 day, 12 hours | no | report |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- The 8 free pizzas meme was very stupid and I'm glad it is no longer popular (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Password was changed by The 8 free pizzas meme was very stupid and I'm glad it is no longer popular (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95021 on 2025-04-18T03:05:22+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 03:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]
User-reported
[edit]- TDMGoffical (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:TDMGoffical. MCE89 (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- ODMpr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username and edits, particularly at Greg Smith (Oregon politician), suggest some PR department editing on behalf of Oregon politicians. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. This seems like a stretch to me absent some clearly identifiable organization with the abbreviation "ODM". Thus far the account has shown willingness to discuss and collaborate, see User talk:Eric Schucht#Greg Smith - Oregon. An immediate block would be excessive here. Mz7 (talk) 23:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- There is: the Oregon Office of Document Management, for one. Also, that discussion comes off as AI-generated; GPTZero puts the first three paragraphs at 100% AI. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- ParoxFX (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:ParoxFX. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Eigensciences (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Eigensciences/sandbox. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Lion Forge (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Diff/1285987276. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Realitisoft-ru (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Diff/1286121962. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yorubabc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Welcome to Yoruba Social and Cultural Association of British Columbia. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits on a controversial topic, as soon as the article protection expires. Requires autoconfirmed protection. Preferably indefinitely. Barseghian Lilia (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of poorly sourced/unsourced information. BOVINEBOY2008 09:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of Indian states and union territories by Human Development Index (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: high level of IP vandalism Justchecking0316 (talk) 13:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated disruptive edits and caste-based content disputes. Requesting semi-protection to prevent further vandalism and ensure stable, neutral information. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC) and sorry i made mistake the actual page was lohar(caste) not lohar i hope you understand and check this page
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive IP editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HanTsî (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Surge of IP vandalism related to contract dispute. Requesting semi for 30 days until this dies down. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of disruption and POV pushing by dynamic IPs over the last couple of months. Per WP:BALKANS, long-term protection seems necessary. Griboski (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued additions from IP addresses that are unsourced. Seems to be a revert needed every couple days for the last month. CNMall41 (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 22:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP socking. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content by anonymous editors stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A user edited with pictures of modified cars which misleading the info. I think we should put the pictires of cars in stock condition or at least nearly stock that match with information text.
Celica21gtfour (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Alxeedo ゐ talk 01:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Battle For Dream Island has the requisite number of prominent secondary sources (3) which have written on the subject. This is enough cause for the creation of a Wikipedia article, as explicitly stated under Wikipedia's criteria for article notability and creation. Gisrhgver (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- You dead sure about that? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
The channel package was shutdown TheMaxChannel528-24 (talk) 23:46, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself.
Requesting immediate archiving... * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 18 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I’ll mostly use AWB for small fixes like typos and other minor errors ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I’ve made over 250+ non automated edits and would like to request AWB for repetitive cleanup, fixing links and also to maintain article quality. 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights @1# Wakabenga 17:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
I already have autoconfirmed status (view here) But if I click verify on a template on my user page that says I have the permission, it has no log. I was wondering if you could somehow grant me this access again so that there may be a log that I have this permission. MersmanD (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
I am trying to update a very outdated article on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Citizens_Party I am trying to upload a photo, but I am unable to as my account is not 4 days old. Please confirm me. NoBudee (talk) 16:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my EC revoked because of gaming of the system. I believe this happened March 22, 2025. Since then, I have attempted to edit constructively on Wikipedia. I want to see if there is a way that I can get EC. Thanks again |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to expand my contributions to Wikipedia by helping address the extensive backlog at NPP. I have been an active participant in the AfC process as a probationary reviewer for multiple months, and I regularly take part in AfDs and occasionally in PRODs within the scope of WP:PHILIPPINES. While I understand that my impact on the backlog may not be significant in terms of numbers, I am committed to performing thorough, policy-aligned reviews to the best of my ability. AstrooKai (Talk) 19:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I had a trial permission to manage redirects close to a year ago, if I remember correctly. I did not have time for the back half of that trial, but have more time now. I have noticed how large the article backlog is and would try to work on lowering that, since I am finding myself with a lot more free time on here. Generally think I have a good past experience with AfD, not as much as some, but understand most guidelines well. May leave some more questionable pages up for a different reviewer, but have a good record adding categories and WikiProjects on my own article. Lots of my current pages are election pages or football pages, so might lean more into reviewing those since I am most familiar with those guidelines. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was granted temporary New page reviewer rights on 14 January 2025 ([8]) for a period of two months and again on 20 March ([9]) for an additional month. This current period is due to expire on 20 April. I would appreciate it if these rights could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 05:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active mostly at the creator side for a while and would like to help out in the filtering/supporting new editors and pages. Juxlos (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
I was granted temporary New Page Reviewer rights for one month, which expire on 20 April. During this period, I carefully completed a reasonable number of reviews (of pages of various topics), including reviewing and tagging new pages with banners, draftifying, requesting speedy deletions, and creating AfDs. While reviewing new pages, I often searched for additional reliable sources and added them to the articles I was reviewing, to ensure that they were not lacking significant coverage references. It was time-consuming, but I felt it was a good thing to do. Therefore, I kindly ask to review my NPP work and, if it's ok, consider granting me permanent NPP rights. Cinder painter (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
I believe I meet most criteria. Plus I already review scientific articles irl, so I would say I have some experience on reviewing in general. Here to help where needed. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was given the New Page Reviewer rights as a one-month trial. This permission will expire on 20 April 2025. During this time, I have been doing active reviewing of new pages and learning more about notability, reliable sources, and the CSD/PROD/AfD process. I tried always to be careful and make constructive reviews. I really want to keep helping with this work. So I would like to ask if possible to renew or give the reviewer rights permanently, depending on my work this last month. Thanks a lot for your time and consideration. Ambrosiawater (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I wish to assist at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I also close WP:RM discussions from time to time and this tool will save me from having to do a technical request every time. I meet the WP:PMCRITERIA. GMH Melbourne (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request permission to become a Pending Changes Reviewer. I have read most of Wikipedia’s core policies. I have also read and understood the guidelines outlined for the Reviewing pending changes. I believe PCR will help me accepting or rejecting edits. I also warn new editors when necessary. Imwin567 (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
The main think I have done on Wikipedia has been undoing unconstructive edits. I am also asking this so I can more easily review recent changes. I will not be rude to newcomers. MersmanD (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
I request rollback rights to quickly revert clear vandalism and disruptive edits. This would help maintain article integrity and ease the workload for admins, especially during active vandalism periods. Thank you for considering my request. VeritasVanguard: "Seeking truth in every edit" 16:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
The main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism. Before, I had to click on the article > view history > undo > put warning on talk page using twinkle. If I had the rollback permission, I would only have to click rollback > put warning on talk page using twinkle. If I had the rollback permission, I would be able to much more easily revert vandalism. Thanks for your consideration. MersmanD (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 89 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 33 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 606 |
| Templates for deletion | 260 |
| Categories for deletion | 157 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 35 |
| All redirects for discussion | 457 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 15 |
| Possible copyright violations | 27 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 189 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 7 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 2 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 76 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 490 |
| Unknown copyright status | 39 |
| Unknown source | 13 |
| No non-free use rationale | 1 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 9 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,281 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 452 |
| Protected against vandalism | 5 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,341 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,197 | 0.49 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,265 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,349 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,926 | 0.59 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,516 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 544,642 | 7.8 |
| All articles lacking sources | 64,694 | 0.93 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 15 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 482,723 | 6.91 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,670 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 106,130 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 287,039 | 4.11 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 129 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 17 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,217 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 806 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 2 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,817 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 413 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,345 | 0.78 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,273 | 0.03 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,361 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,767 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,579 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 811 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 5,104 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,838 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,514 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||