Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary full protection: Content dispute and persistent edit-warring among extended-confirmed users.
(213.109.192.23 (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC))
- Note: A bit early imho...talk-page discussion is underway. I wouldn't protect atm. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- That one talk page section, is nearly 1000 words long – a great gray text wall of dispute and vexation. 213.109.192.23 (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Update: It has now become a full-blown edit war.@Lectonar @Ymblanter @Favonian (213.109.192.23 (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC))
Reason: Frequent heavy IP vandalism Sushidude21! (talk) 10:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, more on the way Sushidude21! (talk) 11:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, more on the way Sushidude21! (talk) 11:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring. Boardwalk.Koi (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- The IP in question is also a sockpuppet - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt/Archive and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt. Brat Forelli🦊 14:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Socks repeatedly copying all the reviews of movies he has appeared in - has been going on for months Arjayay (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. IP keeps changing things like commas and making insulting edit summaries. Ermenrich (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Urgent Request for Protection for the Wikipedia Page of Espérance Sportive de Tunis
Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I am writing to request a protection of the Wikipedia page of Espérance Sportive de Tunis, particularly due to the anticipated surge in global attention surrounding the club's participation in the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup in the USA, which will take place in June 2025.
As the club will be competing in this prestigious event, it is expected that there will be a significant increase in traffic to the page. Unfortunately, this may also lead to attempts to introduce false claims, misinformation, and vandalism. Given the importance of maintaining accurate and reliable content, I believe it is essential to safeguard the page from such disruptions.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the page be any protection you see fit for a reasonable duration before and after the event to preserve the integrity of the article. This will ensure that all information on the page remains correct and that readers receive reliable details about the club during a period of heightened interest.
Thank you for considering this request. I trust that the protection will help maintain the page’s accuracy and reliability, especially at this critical time.
Best regards, Mejri Fares (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I don't think this should be protected per WP:PREEMPTIVE, and there isn't much vandalism on that page. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Morphing IP adding sourced, but very no-NPOV, writing to misrepresent the subject of a parliamentary vote. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:NOTFORUM by various IP ranges dating back to January 2024 and earlier. With the recent season 2 premiere, this has become more constant. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing & addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's been over three months since Al-Kaf's controversial ruling in the World Cup Qualifiers, and unregistered users (the majority of which are from Indonesia) have still been vandalizing his page. Call me paranoid, but I believe the page should be indefinitely semi-protected. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. For at least 3 weeks. Out of precaution, admittedly, since the Chiefs (and the Eagles) are heading to Super Bowl LIX. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Investph (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined In fact, you are the one causing disruption. If you keep this up, you will be the one blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) partially blocked: Investph (talk · contribs) (from Overseas Vietnamese). After looking closer at the history of the disruption by the OP to these articles, I've blocked them from both. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Investph (talk) 14:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined In fact, you are the one causing disruption. If you keep this up, you will be the one blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) partially blocked: Investph (talk · contribs) (from Vietnamese people in France). After looking closer at the history of the disruption by the OP to these articles, I've blocked them from both. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive editing, semi-protection requested. RaschenTechner (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 6 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 15:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop vandalism despite pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 15:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right back to vandalism after page protection expired in November 2024. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently announced album article, target of IP vandals continuously changing chronology convention. —IB [ Poke ] 16:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Highly politicized article with inevitable potential for POV pushing, which has already seen some IP edits be reverted. (Yes, I'm aware there is a current deletion discussion and a current move request for this, but the deletion discussion seems decided on keeping it and the move request wouldn't prevent protection.). O.N.R. (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts. AnotherWeatherEditor (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP user constantly deletes inconvenient information,[1][2][3] semi-protection requested. Jet Jerry (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism by a single school IP DACartman (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Almost all edits to this page are vandalism and vandalism reverts. RaschenTechner (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dell Latitude E6400 (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
change "In one account detailing Rizal's 1887 visit to Prague" to "In one account detailing Rizal's 1887 visit to Vienna" Johlet2 (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined Please use an edit request, and provide sources if necessary. The talk-page of said article isn't protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.